Summary
At issue in this appeal is the lower court’s narrow interpretation of Section 9125 of Pennsylvania’s Criminal History Record Information Act (CHRIA), which restricts employers from considering criminal convictions unless they “relate to the applicant’s suitability for employment in the position for which [they] applied.”
By limiting the scope of Section 9125(b) to the narrow situation where an employer receives an actual copy of the applicant’s criminal history record information file, the district court frustrates Pennsylvania’s public policy goal of rehabilitation and undermines the CHRIA, leaving the plaintiff with no legal recourse to challenge overbroad criminal history screens under Pennsylvania law.
Related to
Related Resources
All resourcesTerrance Hampton, Beyond the Bars
Worker Voices
Letter in Support of AB 248, Fair Wages for Incarcerated Workers in California
Comments & Letters
Donta Brown, Formerly Incarcerated Worker and Organizer
Worker Voices