 |
Unemployment Insurance
State Material
Beyond
Boom and Bust:
Financing
Unemployment Insurance in a Changing Economy
A new NELP report by Marc
Baldwin, Ph.D. (April 2001)
|



Contacts |
Marc
Baldwin, Ph.D.
Author
BaldwinEcon@home.com
(360)
481-4221
Maurice
Emsellem
Unemployment
Insurance Safety Net Project Director
National
Employment Law Project
emsellem@nelp.org
(212)
285-3025, ext. 106
|



|
This
report is part of a series of studies by the National Employment Law Project
(NELP) addressing the current state of unemployment insurance (UI) in America.
While most of the NELP studies have focused on eligibility and benefit
issues, this report calls attention to the structure and outcome of UI benefits
financing at the state level. It is
intended to spark interest in improving the functioning of UI finance, highlight
opportunities to improve access to benefits, and provide a primer for those who
are unfamiliar with the complex world of UI finance.
It calls into question the level of preparedness among the states as the
US economy shows signs of slowing.
Among the key findings are:
- In
2000, UI taxes as a percentage of total covered wages were lower than any
time in the history of the UI system.
- Although the UI system should build reserves
during economic expansions and spend them down during recessions, many
states have deeply cut taxes and endangered their reserves. Tax cuts and declining tax rates have taken over $47 billion
dollars out of the UI system between 1994 and 2000.
- Unemployment insurance taxes peaked at 1.4
percent of wages in 1978, falling to less than half that at .54 percent in
2000.
- Only about 40 percent of the unemployed
receive UI benefits in the United States.
A combination of expanded financial capacity and improved access is
needed to ensure that the UI safety net functions adequately in the next
recession, especially for low-wage, part-time and women workers who are
least likely to receive UI under current programs.
- UI benefit reserves vary dramatically among
the states. Most states have
prudently built reserves, providing an opportunity to reverse austerity
measures imposed on the benefit side of their programs in the 1980s or to
move their programs in line with a changing economy.
- Many other states have made fundamental
changes in the structure of their UI financing which run counter to basic
principles of social insurance, such as provisions to cut benefits despite
deep recessions or uncouple indexing of benefits and wage bases.
The trend toward low reserves and less indexing of tax systems raises
political and technical problems that threaten the security of this vital
insurance system. The report
concludes with recommendations to improve UI financing, including more
progressive payroll taxes and indexing of benefits and tax bases.
For many states, the first step should be reversing the trend toward
cutting UI taxes while under-investing in unemployed workers.
Download
the report
|
 |
|